|
Monday, December 21, 2020
On December 11, 2020, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security published new asylum regulations. The rules are expected to take effect on January 11, 2021, and they significantly change eligibility for asylum including discretionary factors and procedure for applying. The new rule is an overhaul of the entire asylum process and the Trump Administration’s final effort to restrict the asylum landscape in the U.S. for years to come.
Under the new rule, asylum claims regarding generalized harm, threats with no effort to carry them out, or even brief detention will not be considered “persecution”. In addition, cases where individuals were targeted for refusal to join gangs, based on perceived wealth, or even based upon private criminal acts where the government was unaware or uninvolved will not be favorably adjudicated.
In addition, the new rule changes the procedure for applying for asylum. The rule indicates that for those individuals filing applications before an Immigration Court, any particular social group not raised before the Immigration Judge will be waived for all subsequent proceedings including Motions to Reopen or Appeals. In addition, an Immigration Judge will be afforded the ability to pretermit, or dismiss an asylum application without a hearing if they feel that the application and supporting evidence does not meet the requirements for asylum.
Additionally, the new rule provides tighter restrictions on those individuals who may have firmly resettled in another country prior to entering the U.S. or those who may be able to relocate within their home countries. Specifically, if an individual received or could have received permanent status or non-permanent but indefinitely renewable status, they will be subject to the firm resettlement bar. Similarly, those who were present in a third country for more than one year prior to entering the U.S. and did not suffer persecution will be barred. Additionally, individuals who could have relocated within their home country to avoid the alleged persecution have always been barred from applying for asylum. However, the new rules provide factors to be considered when performing this analysis such as size of the country, geographic locus of alleged persecution, size and reach of the alleged persecutor, and applicant’s ability to relocate to the U.S.
Under the current law, an individual who files a frivolous asylum application is barred from receiving any immigration benefit. The new rule redefines the term “frivolous” to include not only false asylum claims but also applications that include fabricated evidence, those filed without regard to the merits of the claim, and even those claims that are foreclosed by applicable law.
Like many immigration applications, discretion plays an important role in the decision-making process. The new rule provides three significantly adverse factors including: (1) unlawful entry or attempted entry into the U.S.; (2) failure to apply for protection in at least one country through which the applicant traveled en route to the U.S.; and (3) use of fraudulent documents to enter the U.S. In addition the rule outlines nine discretionary factors that will result in a denial of the asylum application unless there is a showing of extraordinary circumstances, or exceptional and extremely unusual hardship. These factors include: (1) spending 14+ days in a third country while en route to the U.S.; (2) traveling through more than one country en route to the U.S.; (3) criminal convictions that would have triggered a bar to asylum even if they are ultimately vacated, reversed or expunged; (4) accruing more than one year of unlawful presence; (5) failure to comply with tax obligations; (6) having 2+ asylum applications denied for any reason; (7) withdrawing or abandoning prior asylum applications; (8) failing to attend asylum interview; (9) moving to reopen based upon changed country conditions that occurred more than one year ago.
This new rule is anticipated to take effect on January 11, 2021 and will only apply to cases filed on or after this date. However, the new rules concerning frivolousness, internal relocation, discretion, and firm resettlement apply to all cases, even those filed before January 11, 2021. As a result, the lawyers at NPZ Law Group, P.C. would recommend that any individuals who feel that they have a meritorious claim consider filing their applications for asylum prior to January 11, 2021.
While this rule is anticipated to take effect in just a few weeks, it is possible that litigation may halt implementation of the new rule. The lawyers at NPZ Law Group, P.C. remain alert and will provide updates regarding these changes as they become available.
To obtain more information regarding the new Asylum rules, or to schedule a consultation with any of the Immigration and Nationality Lawyers at the Nachman Phulwani Zimovcak (NPZ) Law Group, please feel free to call us at 201-670-0006. Our main office is in Ridgewood, New Jersey. We also have an office located in Raritan, New Jersey, and New York City. NPZ also maintains affiliated offices in India and in Canada. For more information about our Firm’s immigration and nationality law practice, please feel free to visit our website at http://www.visaserve.com or to send us an e-mail at info@visaserve.com
National in scope, the business immigration law firm of NPZ Law Group represents clients from throughout the United States and around world. Regionally, our attorneys remain committed to serving the immigration needs of businesses in the Tri-state area and the Hudson Valley, including residents of Ridgewood, Newark, and Jersey City, Burlington County, Bergen County, Camden County, Cumberland County, Essex County, Hudson County, Mercer County, Middlesex County, Monmouth County, Morris County, Passaic County, Salem County, Union County, northern New Jersey, southern New Jersey, central New Jersey, NJ; New York City, Rockland County, Orange County, Westchester County, Kings County, Sullivan County, Ulster County, New York, NY; Chicago, Illinois, IL; and Toronto and Montreal, Canada. Our nationwide practice focused on quality legal representation and personal service.
Notwithstanding any statements contained in this website, results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
No aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the New Jersey Supreme Court.
|
|
|
|