|
Friday, July 20, 2018
The validity of a marriage under U.S. immigration laws can determine whether a foreign national is be able to obtain a family-based immigrant or nonimmigrant visa, legalize unlawful status, or file a waiver of inadmissibility or deportability. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the basic body of U.S. immigration laws, does not define the term "marriage" nor “spouse” in strict terms nor does it require that the two individuals meet the standards of either definition for the purpose of determining the validity of a marriage. Instead, the INA requires an analysis of the circumstances surrounding the marriage to determine that the marriage fulfills the minimum of three (3) components necessary for a valid marriage. The purpose of this article is to explain the minimum threshold requirements of marriage for immigration purposes. For the most part, abiding by the laws of the place of marriage seem to trump most, but not all, other governing bodies to determine marriage.
To provide a historical perspective, it is important to note that the minimum threshold for determining the validity of a marriage was established by the INA as a result of the interpretation of case law. This framework has been consistently applied by the U.S. Attorney General, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), immigration officials, and most federal courts to determine the validity of marriage under the INA. The same framework has been laid down in the Department of State's (DOS) Foreign Affairs Manual.
The framework for analyzing the validity of any marriage for U.S. immigration purposes consists of the following three components:
(1) Laws of the place where the marriage took place or was celebrated;
(2) Laws of the State of residence or proposed State of residence in the United States; and
(3) Bona Fides of the marriage for immigration purposes. The marriage to be valid under the U.S. immigration laws needs to satisfy all three components.
To satisfy the first component, the underlying principle is that the law of the land where the marriage takes place ultimately trumps any other governing body elsewhere in the world, with certain limitations. If the law of the place of marriage is complied with and the marriage is recognized, then the marriage is deemed to be valid for immigration purposes. Immigration officials and federal courts insist that a marriage meets the procedural and substantive requirements of the state or country where the marriage was "celebrated," whether those requirements involve state licensing, religious recognition or even no "celebration" at all in the case of "common law" marriage (marriages based on cohabitation without an official ceremony or registration). Thus, a religious marriage, uncle-niece marriage or first-cousin marriage is considered valid for immigration purposes if it is recognized by the sovereign authority in the country or state as valid, provided that it satisfies the requirement of the other two components of the framework.
Once a marriage passes the threshold inquiry regarding its validity where celebrated, the BIA and Federal Courts generally proceed with the presumption that the marriage is valid everywhere unless it violates the public policy of the couple's state of domicile or intended state of domicile, "distinctly expressed" in state legislation. To be valid for U.S. immigration purposes, the marriage should not violate the strong public policy expressed in the criminal law of its state of domicile. To comply with the second component of the framework, it is pertinent to check whether the state's criminal law expressly forbids the couple from both marrying and living together or just the latter. For instance, if the law of state of proposed residence only forbids certain type of the marriage such as uncle-niece marriage or first-cousin marriage but does not expressly prohibit the couple living together, the marriage will be held valid for immigration purposes provided the marriage meets the procedural and substantive requirements of the state or country in which it was celebrated. It is also important to determine whether the couple’s domicile state or intended state of domicile expressly prohibits evading the state's law by leaving the state for the purpose of being married, and with the intention of returning after the celebration of marriage. If that is the case, the couple can be held criminally liable for evading the state law.
Finally, even if a marriage is legally valid where celebrated and there is no strong public policy exception for recognition of that category of relationship, U.S. immigration officials look at the particular facts of a couple's life together in order to determine whether their individual marriage is Bona Fide for immigration purposes. This is a practical concession to the fact that U.S. immigration benefits are so desirable that some people are willing to enter into "fraudulent" marriages merely for the purpose of obtaining immigration benefits. While legally valid for other purposes, these marriages are not valid under the INA.
Although the United States and all of its constituent states unanimously recognize the general rule that a marriage, valid where celebrated, is valid everywhere, the rest of two variables of the above-detailed framework should also be satisfied. Thus, in evaluating the validity of marriage for immigration purposes, although the prime focus is on the law of the state or country where the marriage was allegedly contracted, the couple's relationship should not violate the strong public policy expressed in the criminal law of its state of domicile or intended state of domicile, and the marriage should meet the Bona Fide requirements.
If you should have any questions or need more information about the ways in which the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Laws may impact you, your family, your friends or your colleagues, please feel free to contact the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Lawyers of NPZ Law Group, P.C. by e-mailing us at info@visaserve.com or by calling us at 201-670-0006. We also invite you to visit our website at www.visaserve.com
National in scope, the business immigration law firm of NPZ Law Group represents clients from throughout the United States and around world. Regionally, our attorneys remain committed to serving the immigration needs of businesses in the Tri-state area and the Hudson Valley, including residents of Ridgewood, Newark, and Jersey City, Burlington County, Bergen County, Camden County, Cumberland County, Essex County, Hudson County, Mercer County, Middlesex County, Monmouth County, Morris County, Passaic County, Salem County, Union County, northern New Jersey, southern New Jersey, central New Jersey, NJ; New York City, Rockland County, Orange County, Westchester County, Kings County, Sullivan County, Ulster County, New York, NY; Chicago, Illinois, IL; and Toronto and Montreal, Canada. Our nationwide practice focused on quality legal representation and personal service.
Notwithstanding any statements contained in this website, results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
No aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the New Jersey Supreme Court.
|
|
|
|