Make a Payment 
<a href="https://secure.blueoctane.net/forms/E8TLX753GRBB">Click Here To Load This Formexperts.com Form</a>

NPZ Immigration Law Blog

Thursday, July 14, 2011

THE NEUFELD MEMO REVISITED AND THE H-1B VISA CLIMATE: The New Face of Enforcement in the H-1B World.

As a result of increased site visits and a general inclination to decrease the number of H-1B's approved, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ("USCIS") published a watershed memo on January 8th, 2010 ("the Neufeld Memo"). The Neufeld Memo radically changed the way that H-1B's were adjudicated. The Neufeld Memo also put enormous pressure on employers to satisfy additional evidence requirements justifying any work performed by an H-1B visa holder off of the H-1B visa petitioner's premises. Additionally, the Neufeld Memo added additional requirements for H-1B petitioners to obtain H-1B extensions. It is this author's opinion that as a result of this Neufeld Memo, employers will see automatic requests for evidence in any case where the beneficiary may be performing offsite work and for any H-1B visa extension petition. It continues to be our strong recommendation that employers add a section to their H-1B petitions which cover the issues addressed by the Neufeld Memo. Even one and one half years after this Memo was promulgated.

USCIS is still concerned about whether or not there is a valid employer-employee relationship. The Neufeld Memo basically states that hiring a person to work in the United States requires more than merely paying the wage or placing that person on the payroll of the H-1B petitioning organization. In considering whether or not there is a valid "employer-employee relationship" for purposes of H-1B petition adjudication, USCIS must determine if the employer exercises a sufficient level of "control" over the prospective H-1B employee. Clearly, if the employee will be working "on site" in the H-1B petitioner's office, doing specific tasks for the petitioner, this will not be viewed as raising a "control" issue. However, with the publication of the Neufeld Memo, it remains our opinion that all employers need to address the "control" issue upon initial submission of an H-1B petition to the USCIS.

The prospective H-1B petitioner organization must be able to establish that it has the "right to control" when, where, and how the prospective H-1B nonimmigrant beneficiary will perform the professional and specialty occupation job and the USCIS will consider the following items to make such a determination (with no one of the following factors being decisive with regard to the issue of "control") :

(1) Does the potential H-1B petitioner supervise the prospective H-1B beneficiary and is such supervision off-site or on-site?

(2) If the supervision is off-site, how does the petitioner maintain such supervision, i.e. weekly calls, reporting back to main office routinely, or site visits by the petitioner?

(3) Does the petitioner have the right to control the work of the beneficiary on a day-to-day basis if such control is required?

(4) Does the petitioner provide the tools or instrumentalities needed for the beneficiary to perform the duties of employment?

(5) Does the petitioner hire, pay, and have the ability to fire the beneficiary?

(6) Does the petitioner evaluate the work-product of the beneficiary, i.e. progress/performance reviews?

(7) Does the petitioner claim the beneficiary for tax purposes?

(8) Does the petitioner provide the beneficiary any type of employee benefits?

(9) Does the beneficiary use proprietary information of the petitioner in order to perform the duties of employment?

(10) Does the beneficiary produce an end-product that is directly linked to the petitioner's line of business?

(11) Does the petitioner have the ability to control the manner and means in which the work product of the beneficiary is accomplished?

In addition to the foregoing, the USCIS provides specific examples of employment situations in which the "control" issue is not considered to be problematic. Please note that there are numerous variations of these scenarios and that each employment situation may not fit squarely into the examples provided by the USCIS.

The "Traditional Employment" Scenario:

If the prospective H-1B beneficiary works at an office location owned/leased by the prospective H-1B petitioner and the beneficiary reports directly to the petitioner on a daily basis, the petitioner sets the work schedule of the beneficiary, the beneficiary uses the petitioner's tools/instrumentalities to perform the duties of employment, and the petitioner directly reviews the work-product of the beneficiary. The petitioner claims the beneficiary for tax purposes and provides medical benefits to the beneficiary.

The "Temporary/Occasional Off-Site Employment" Scenario:

The prospective H-1B nonimmigrant petitioner is an accounting firm with numerous clients. The beneficiary is an accountant. The beneficiary is required to travel to different client sites for auditing purposes. In performing such audits, the beneficiary must use established firm practices. If the beneficiary travels to an off-site location outside the geographic location of the employer to perform an audit, the petitioner provides food and lodging costs to the beneficiary. The beneficiary reports to a centralized office when not performing audits for clients and has an assigned office space. The beneficiary is paid by the petitioner and receives employee benefits from the petitioner.

The "Long-Term/Permanent Off-Site Employment" Scenario:

The prospective H-1B nonimmigrant petitioner is an architectural firm and the beneficiary is an architect. The petitioner has a contract with a client to build a structure in a location out of state from the petitioner's main offices. The petitioner will place its architects and other staff at the off-site location while the project is being completed. The contract between the petitioner and client states that the petitioner will manage its employees at the off-site location. The petitioner provides the instruments and tools used to complete the project, the beneficiary reports directly to the petitioner for assignments, and progress reviews of thebeneficiary are completed by the petitioner. The underlying contract states that the petitioner has the right to ultimate control of the beneficiary's work.

The USCIS has specifically stated that the following scenarios are now NOT acceptable to meet the "control" issue with regard to H-1B employment:

The "Self-Employed Beneficiaries" Scenario:

The prospective H-1B nonimmigrant petitioner is a fashion merchandising company that is owned by the beneficiary. The beneficiary is a fashion analyst. The beneficiary is the sole operator, manager, and employee of the petitioning company. The beneficiary cannot be fired by the petitioning company. There is no outside entity which can exercise control over the beneficiary. The petitioner has not provided evidence that the corporation, and not the beneficiary herself, will be controlling her work.

The above example (cited in the Neufeld Memo) is similar to a case recently addressed by our office for one of our clients. We have successfully processed a case such as this in the past. However, it is likely that these facts will inevitably lead to a much more complex H-1B case processing procedure by the government.

The USCIS admits that a sole stockholder of a corporation can be employed by a corporation as the corporation is a separate legal entity from its owners and even its sole owner. However, an H-1B beneficiary/employee who owns a majority of the sponsoring entity and who reports to no one but him or her may not be able to establish that a valid employment relationship exists in that the beneficiary. The issue is whether the prospective H-1B nonimmigrant petitioner can establish the requisite "control".

The Neufeld Memo states that the Administrative Appeals Office ("AAO") correctly determined that corporations are separate and distinct from their stockholders and that a corporation may petition for, and hire, their principal stockholders as H-1B nonimmigrant employees. However, the AAO did not reach the question of how, or whether, petitioners must establish that such beneficiaries are bona fide "employees" of "United States employers" having an "employer-employee relationship." While it is correct that a petitioner may employ and seek H-1B classification for a beneficiary who happens to have a significant ownership interest in a petitioner, this does not automatically mean that the beneficiary is a bona fide employee.

What we believe that the USCIS is saying is that if a corporation's sole shareholder and sole employee is the H-1B nonimmigrant beneficiary, the case is likely to be denied. If the H-1B nonimmigrant beneficiary is one of several shareholders (not a majority shareholder of the corporation and is NOT the sole employee) then the USCIS can approve the case. It appears to be the case that any person who has a small company, where the H-1B beneficiary is one of the main officers or shareholders of the company, will have a very difficult time obtaining an H-1B approval. This was one of the new rules that came out of the Neufeld Memo. In addition, our office continues to find that prospective H-1B nonimmigrant petitioners which have approval of an H-1B already (that fit in this scenario) are likely to have difficulty extending the H-1B nonimmigrant professional and specialty occupation visa on a going forward basis.

The "Independent Contractor" Scenario:

The beneficiary is a sales representative. The prospective H-1B nonimmigrant petitioner is a company that designs and manufactures skis. The beneficiary sells these skis for the petitioner and works on commission. The beneficiary also sells skis for other companies that design and manufacture skis that are independent of the petitioner. The petitioner does not claim the beneficiary as an employee for tax purposes. The petitioner does not control when, where, or how the beneficiary sells its or any other manufacturer's products. The petitioner does not set the work schedule of the beneficiary and does not conduct performance reviews of the beneficiary.

In the past, the USCIS has stated that H-1B nonimmigrants must be employees, which means that they must be paid using a W-2 (and not a 1099). The Neufeld Memo solidifies this long-standing rule and provides a basis for a denial of an H-1B where an H-1B visa holder is treated as an "Independent Contractor".

The "Third-Party Placement/ "Job-Shop"" Scenario:

The prospective H-1B nonimmigrant petitioner is a computer consulting company. The petitioner has contracts with numerous outside companies in which it supplies these companies with employees to fulfill specific staffing needs. The specific positions are not outlined in the contract between the petitioner and the third-party company but are staffed on an as-needed basis. The beneficiary is a computer analyst. The beneficiary has been assigned to work for the third-party company to fill a core position to maintain the third-party company's payroll. Once placed at the client company, the beneficiary reports to a manager who works for the third-party company. The beneficiary does not report to the petitioner for work assignments, and all work assignments are determined by the third-party company. The petitioner does not control how the beneficiary will complete daily tasks, and no propriety information of the petitioner is used by the beneficiary to complete any work assignments. The beneficiary's end-product, the payroll, is not in any way related to the petitioner's line of business, which is computer consulting. The beneficiary's progress reviews are completed by the client' company, not the petitioner.

This scenario eliminates personnel or consulting agency placements for the H-1B nonimmigrant visa category. All placement firms that now use the H-1B visas to place workers at third-party companies whereby the H-1B petitioner's role is basically relegated to payroll will no longer be able to utilize H-1B visas. The only type of H-1B visas that will be allowed by personnel agencies will be for in-house positions. One good thing that comes out of the Neufeld Memo is that many current H-1B visas, being used by some Indian Job Shops, who place workers in third-party positions, will be permissible only if the "control" issues are appropriately met. As a result of the Neufeld Memo, shabby and ill prepared job shops will slowly be eliminated as they will be unable to use the H-1B classification. Ultimately, this will leave more H-1B visas available for the "traditional" employers.

As previously pointed out, H-1B nonimmigrant professional and specialty occupation worker employers will have an extra burden proving the Employer-Employee relationship on initial H-1B petitions.

The Neufeld Memo states that the prospective H-1B nonimmigrant petitioner can demonstrate an employer-employee relationship by providing a combination of the following or similar types of evidence:

• A complete itinerary of services or engagements that specifies the dates of each service or engagement, the names and addresses of the actual employers, and the names and addresses of the establishment, venues, or locations where the services will be performed for the period of time requested;

• Copy of signed Employment Agreement between the petitioner and beneficiary detailing the terms and conditions of employment;

• Copy of an employment offer letter that clearly describes the nature of the employer-employee relationship and the services to be performed by the beneficiary;

• Copy of relevant portionsof valid contracts between the petitioner and a client (in which the petitioner has entered into a business agreement for which the petitioner's employees will be utilized) that establishes that while the petitioner's employees are placed at the third-party worksite, the petitioner will continue to have the right to control its employees;

• Copies of signed contractual agreements, statements of work, work orders, service agreements, and letters between the petitioner and the authorized officials of the ultimate end-client companies where the work will actually be performed by the beneficiary, which provide information such as a detailed description of the duties the beneficiary will perform, the qualifications that are required to perform the job duties, salary or wages paid, hours worked, benefits, a brief description of who will supervise the beneficiary and their duties, and any other related evidence;

• Copy of position description or any other documentation that describes the skills required to perform the job offered, the source of the instrumentalities and tools needed to perform the job, the product to be developed or the service to be provided, the location where the beneficiary will perform the duties, the duration of the relationship between the petitioner and beneficiary, whether the petitioner has the right to assign additional duties, the extent of petitioner's discretion over when and how long the beneficiary will work, the method of payment, the petitioner's role in paying and hiring assistants to be utilized by the beneficiary, whether the work to be performed is part of the regular business of the petitioner, the provision of employee benefits, and the tax treatment of the beneficiary in relation to the petitioner;

• A description of the performance review process; and/or

• Copy of petitioner's organizational chart, demonstrating beneficiary's supervisory chain.

Our office continues to suggest to our prospective H-1B nonimmigrant petitioners that employer's filing initial H-1B petitions submit some or all of this information as part of their petition. If not, the employer should expect an extensive Request For Evidence ("RFE") document from the government requesting detailed information.

The New Rule For H-1B Extension Petitions.

The new rule for H-1B extension petitions is that a beneficiary must continue to establish that a valid employer-employee relationship exists. The prospective H-1B nonimmigrant petitioner can do so by providing evidence that the petitioner continues to have the right to control the work of the beneficiary, as described above. The prospective H-1B nonimmigrant petitioner may also include a combination of the following or similar evidence to document that it maintained a valid employer-employee relationship with the beneficiary throughout the initial H-1B status approval period:

• Copies of the beneficiary's pay records (leave and earnings statements, and pay stubs, etc.) for the period of the previously approved H-1B status;

• Copies of the beneficiary's payroll summaries and/or Form W-2s, evidencing wages paid to the beneficiary during the period of previously approved H-1B status;

• Copy of Time Sheets during the period of previously approved H-1B status;

• Copy of prior years' work schedules;

• Documentary examples of work product created or produced by the beneficiary for the past H-1B validity period, (i.e., copies of: business plans, reports, presentations, evaluations, recommendations, critical reviews, promotional materials, designs, blueprints, newspaper articles, web-site text, news copy, photographs of prototypes, etc.). Note: The materials must clearly substantiate the author and date created;

• Copy of dated performance review(s); and/or

• Copy of any employment history records, including but not limited to, documentation showing date of hire, dates of job changes, i.e. promotions, demotions, transfers, layoffs, and pay changes with effective dates.

If USCIS determines, while adjudicating the extension petition, that the prospective H-1B nonimmigrant petitioner failed to maintain a valid employer-employee relationship with the beneficiary throughout the initial approval period, or violated any other terms of its prior H-1B petition, the extension petition may be denied unless there is a compelling reason to approve the new petition (e.g., the petitioner is able to demonstrate that it did not meet all the terms and conditions through no fault of his own.)

Until the promulgation of the Neufeld Memo, H-1B extensions have been granted almost automatically as long as the prospective H-1B nonimmigrant petitioner stated that the beneficiary would be performing the same work as previously petitioned for. The Neufeld Memo exponentially increased the number of RFE's and denials in extension cases.

Our office is convinced that these new and harsh rules are a result of the USCIS site visits and numerous violations USCIS has seen as a result of the site visits. The state of the U.S. economy certainly has not helped the situation any either. USCIS will no longer permit employers to flaunt the rules and "business as usual" will no longer be an acceptable mode. We continue to see an uptick in ICE, CIS, and DOL compliance issues. We continue to warn our employer clients about the government scrutiny in many areas where there may be perceive abuse of the U.S. immigration and nationality laws.


Archived Posts

2018
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
USCIS NEWS: USCIS TO BEGIN USING MORE SECURE MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE
O ABC do Visto H-1B (Parte 8 de um conjunto de 8 textos):
Renewing Your H-1B Visa
Speaking Session on "Investment Visas and Other Immigration Opportunities to the US", sponsored by NPZ Law Group at AmCham Slovakia, Bratislava
DOS Update: Visa Bulletin for May 2018
H-1B Nonimmigrant Work Visa Classification
O ABC do Visto H-1B (Parte 7 de um conjunto de 8 textos): Opções de visto para quem não tiver sua petição selecionada na loteria da cota H-1B
Event: Establishing Business in USA, Leading to Business Immigration
FY 2018-2019 H-1B CAP REACHED: NOW IS THE TIME TO THINK ABOUT YOUR H-1B BACK-UP PLAN.
H-1B Visas for Tech Workers
O USCIS atinge a cota para os vistos H-1B para o ano fiscal de 2019 já na primeira semana de aceitação de petições
USCIS divulga memorando sobre múltiplas petições para o visto H-1B em nome de um mesmo beneficiário
New E-Verify.gov Website a User-Friendly Source to Verify Employment Eligibility
H-1B NONIMMIGRANT WORK VISA UPDATE: With a Looming Cloud of Anticipated Investigations, Audits and Site Visits, the USCIS Reaches FY 2019 H-1B Cap.
FRAUD, TECHNICAL VIOLATIONS, AND/OR MISREPRESENTATION THAT COULD TRIGGER H-1B VISA REFUSAL OR ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING UNDER 221(g) AT A CONSULAR POST (PART VIII of an VIII Part Series)
O ABC do Visto H-1B (Parte 6 de um conjunto de 8 textos) Se a cota do visto H-1B for atingida, ainda tenho chance de obter o visto H-1B?
Traveling With Your Family on an H-1B Visa
March
USCIS ISSUES A POLICY MEMO ON THE DESIGNATION OF MATTER OF S-P-, INC.
O ABC do Visto H-1B (Parte 5 de um conjunto de 8 textos) - Meu diploma de mestrado permite que eu solicite o visto H-1B pela ‘master cap’?
Nachman Phulwani Zimovcak (NPZ) Law Group, P.C., an Immigration and Nationality Law Firm with Offices in NY, NJ, and India, is Proud to be one of those "Companies that Care".
USCIS Will Temporarily Suspend Premium Processing for Fiscal Year 2019 H-1B Cap Petitions
DOS UPDATE: VISA BULLETIN FOR APRIL 2018
The H-1B Visa Lottery Explained
O ABC do Visto H-1B (Parte 4 de um conjunto de 8 textos)
LAST CALL: IS YOUR HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT READY FOR THE 2018-2019 H-1B PROFESSIONAL VISA LOTTERY? TO MAKE A LOTTERY ENTRY, H-1B VISAS WILL HAVE TO BE FILED BY APRIL 2nd, 2018.
Comparing the Potential Plans for Family Based Immigration Reform
O ABC do Visto H-1B (Parte 3 de um conjunto de 8 textos) O que os empregadores de profissionais com o visto H-1B precisam saber sobre o LCA para evitar o risco de não conformidade com as regras do DOL
WHAT IF MY CASE DID NOT GET CHOSEN IN THE H-1B LOTTERY: EXPLORING WORK VISA OPTIONS BEYOND THE H-1B CAP (PART VII of an VIII Part Series)
ABCs OF H-1Bs (THIS IS PART VI OF AN VIII PART SERIES): THE H-1B CAP WAS REACHED; DO I STILL HAVE A CHANCE OF GETTING AN H-1B VISA?
ABCs OF H-1Bs (THIS IS PART V OF AN VIII PART SERIES): DOES MY MASTER’S DEGREE QUALIFY ME FOR THE H-1B MASTER’S CAP?
Are you Seeking a Temporary Work Visa? Review These Requirements
Trump amplia criticismo internacional ao usar o termo ‘países de merda’ em reunião sobre imigração
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals: Response to January 2018 Preliminary Injunction
USCIS CLARIFIES POLICY ON REQUIREMENTS FOR THIRD-PARTY WORKSITE H-1B PETITIONS
Is the Graham-Durbin Proposal Good for DREAMers?
February
January
2017
December
November
October
September
O que significa o anúncio do fim do DACA na prática
Trump amplia veto migratório que agora inclui Coreia do Norte e Venezuela
USCIS retoma o processamento premium para certas categorias de aplicantes para o visto H-1B
FACT OR FICTION: USCIS TO RESUME PREMIUM PROCESSING FOR ALL H-1B PETITIONS BY OCTOBER 3RD.
DOS UPDATE: VISA BULLETIN FOR OCTOBER 2017
Trump’s latest expanded travel ban includes North Korea and Venezuela
KNOW YOUR RIGHTS! - POWER POINT SLIDE
What is an Adjustment of Status and How Do I Submit a Green Card Application?
GAMECHANGER: DOS REVISES "30/60 DAY RULE" POLICY WITH "90 DAY RULE" ON MISREPRESENTATION AND FRAUDULENT (PRECONCEIVED) INTENT.
Indians May Soon Find It Easier to Immigrate to the U.S.
Inscrições para a loteria do green card começam em 3 de outubro e vão até 7 de novembro
Novo plano de imigração de Trump pode reduzir imigração legal pela metade
Our Immigration Lawyers Discuss the Fate of the Dreamers
USCIS Resumes Premium Processing for Certain Categories of Applicants Seeking H-1B Visas.
Trump's New Immigration Plan Could Cut Legal Immigration in Half
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals: 2017 Rescission Announcement: What It Means
NPZ LAW GROUP ECHOS THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE'S ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT THE 2019 DIVERSITY VISA LOTTERY. AS WE HAVE SAID IN THE PAST . . . "IF YOU ARE NOT IN IT, YOU CANNOT WIN IT!
Visto P-1A permite que atletas talentosos migrem para os EUA
Rescission Of Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
Trump acaba com programa que protege imigrantes ilegais que chegaram aos EUA quando crianças
Juiz suspende lei do Texas contra "cidades santuário"
August
July
June
Veto migratório de Trump entra em vigor parcialmente esta noite
TRUMP'S TRAVEL BAN 2.0 GOES INTO EFFECT TODAY (6/29/2017) NIGHT
Will NAFTA be Trumped?
ICLE immigration law panel for the immigration basics program given at the loss center in New Brunswick
USCIS Introduces New I-485 Form
Cuidados que estudantes com o visto F-1 precisam ter nas férias
Promoting Cultural Exchange with a J-1 Visa
VISA BULLETIN UPDATE FROM DOS: June 13, 2017
Visto P-3, o visto para artistas e profissionais do mundo do entretenimento
Intercâmbio Cultural com o visto J-1
Exploring the P-3 Visa for Artists or Entertainers in a Culturally Unique Program
IIFA FESTIVAL 2017 ANOTHER REASON TO LOVE NEW YORK! NEW YORK IIFA EVENT 2017! . . . JULY 14TH & 15TH!
Governo Trump anula programa criado por Obama para proteger imigrantes ilegais cujos filhos estão em situação regular nos EUA
Yeni Girişimci Şartlı Tahliye Kuralları 15 Temmuz 2017'de geçerli.
Why Every Immigrant Needs a Lawyer
YEŞİL KART'IN AİLE SPONSORLUĞUYLA YAPILMASI: ABD'ye Göç Etmek İçin Bir Yol
GÖÇMENLİK ÜZERİNE BAŞKANLIK EMİRLERİ
COMO AGIR AO SER ABORDADO POR UM AGENTE DE IMIGRAÇÃO
Departamento do Trabalho dos EUA adota medidas para ampliar proteção aos americanos
Como migrar do visto de turista ou de negócios para o visto de estudante
A Look at the O-1B Artist Visa
La Nouvelle Dérogation pour les Entrepreneurs prendra effet le 15 juillet 2017.
Turistas podem verificar via site o prazo limite de sua permanência nos EUA
DOL updates: US SECRETARY OF LABOR PROTECTS AMERICANS, DIRECTS AGENCIES TO AGGRESSIVELY CONFRONT VISA PROGRAM FRAUD AND ABUSE
CBP Reminds Travelers of Departure Date with New I-94 Website Feature
O visto EB-5 como alternativa ao H-1B
Imigrantes ilegais que trabalham no campo estão na mira do governo americano
May
Check Out the Redesigned Stakeholder Webinars Page
DHS UPDATE: One Year of the 24-month STEM OPT Extension
DHS UPDATE: B-1/B-2 Visitors Who Want to Enroll in School
DHS UPDATE: Summer Vacation Reminders for F-1 Students
Saiba como solicitar o green card no caso de casamento
Nova regra para empreendedores estrangeiros nos EUA entra em vigor em 15 de julho
As the H-1B Visa is Dismantled, Indian Immigrants Look to the EB-5 Visa
Illegal Farm Workers Fear Immigration Crackdown
Mudanças nas regras do visto H1B e a anatomia das auditorias do governo
VISAS MANTIS and Implications for Trump’s “Extreme Vetting”
DOS UPDATE: VISA BULLETIN FOR JUNE 2017
ANÁLISE: As ordens executivas de Trump sobre imigração
Obtaining a Green Card Through Marriage
Estrangeiros vítimas de certos crimes nos EUA têm direito ao chamado Visto U
The New Entrepreneur Parole Rule will be Effective on July 15, 2017.
EXECUTIVE ORDERS ON IMMIGRATION: An Analysis on the Present State of President Trump’s Travel Ban Attempts By: Snehal Batra, Esq.
ANATOMY OF H-1B AUDITS AND INVESTIGATIONS
Green Card por meio de relação familiar
EUA começam a devolver petições para o visto H1B que não foram selecionadas
USCIS: Cap Gap for Students Without a H-1B Application Rejection or Decision
Amor a la “Green Card” no Canadá
GETTING THE GREEN CARD THROUGH FAMILY SPONSORSHIP: One Way To Immigrate to the U.S.
Trabalhadores religiosos podem obter visto específico para os EUA
IMMIGRATION LAWYER MS. MALKA GIVES INTERVIEW ON NATIONAL RADIO ABOUT THE EFFECTS ON CANADIAN IMMIGRATION FOLLOWING THE TRUMP ELECTION.
Love à La “Green Card” - Canada Immigration
COMUNICADO OFICIAL: DHS cria escritório para vítimas de crimes praticados por imigrantes ilegais
April
Will the U.S. Extend Temporary Protected Status for Eligible Haitians?
Boletim do Departamento de Estado dos EUA para Maio de 2017
DOS UPDATE: VISA BULLETIN FOR MAY 2017
SPIRITUAL ENLIGHTENMENT AND U.S. IMMIGRATION: Understanding the Religious Visa (R Visa).
DHS Announces Launch of new Office for Victims of Illegal Immigrant Crime
Mudança recente no credenciamento de escolas e faculdades nos EUA afeta vistos de alguns estudantes
USCIS UPDATE: Certain Students Applying for English Language Study and 24-month STEM OPT Extension Programs Affected by the ACICS Loss of Accreditation
H-1B GÖÇMEN OLMAYAN ÇALIŞMA VİZESİ GÜNCELLEMESİ: USCIS (Amerika Vatandaşlık ve Göçmenlik Ofisi), 2018 Yılı H-1B Cap Rastlantısal Seçim Sürecini Tamamladı
USCIS, Yeniden Tasarlanmış Yeşil Kartlar ve Çalışma İzin Belgelerini Yayımlıyor
GOVERNO DOS EUA LANÇA NOVAS VERSÕES DO GREEN CARD E DO DOCUMENTO DE AUTORIZAÇÃO DE TRABALHO
ATUALIZAÇÃO SOBRE O VISTO DE TRABALHO H-1B: USCIS conclui processo de seleção via loteria para o ano fiscal de 2018
Esclarecimentos sobre os procedimentos de deportação
USCIS Reminds Beneficiaries of Temporary Protected Status for Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone of May 21 Termination
USCIS Will Issue Redesigned Green Cards and Employment Authorization Documents
H-1B NONIMMIGRANT WORK VISA UPDATE: USCIS Completes the H-1B Cap Random Selection Process for FY 2018
Immigration Arrests Double in Just 11 Years
THERE HAS BEEN A RECENT INCREASE IN IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS: What Defenses Are Available to Persons Facing Deportation?
Alvos das ações do ICE
o Departamento do Trabalho dos EUA, por meio da Divisão de Salário e Horas (WHD), continua promovendo auditorias e investigações relacionadas ao visto H-1B
Barreiras de três e dez anos: Como novas regras ampliam elegibilidade para pedido de perdao
O NPZ LAW GROUP CONTINUA A INCENTIVAR QUE EMPREGADORES QUE SOLICITAM OS VISTOS H-1B E L-1 ENTENDAM AS VISITAS AO LOCAL DE TRABALHO FEITAS PELO FDNS REFERENTES AOS VISTOS H-1B E L-1
H-1B NONIMMIGRANT WORK VISA UPDATE: With a Looming Cloud of Anticipated Investigations, Audits and Site Visits, USCIS Reaches FY 2017-2018 H-1B Cap.
USCIS ALERT: BATTLING FRAUD AND ABUSE IN THE H-1B VISA PROGRAM.
Justice Department Cautions Employers Seeking H-1B Visas Not to Discriminate Against U.S. Workers
March
February
January
2016
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2015
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2014
December
H-1B SEASON IS UPON US . . . WILL THIS YEAR'S ECONOMY BRING A LOTTERY? PLANNING FOR THE H-1B VISA SEASON MAY BE THE KEY TO BEING ABLE TO CONTINUE YOUR WORK AUTHORIZED STATUS IN THE U.S.
THE NEW EXPRESS ENTRY SYSTEM EXPLAINED
"Know Before You Go": NPZ Law Group Helps Ease The Stress of Holiday Travel For Certain Foreign Nationals.
5 Cosas que se deben saber sobre cómo las acciones del Presidente Obama impactarán a Inmigrantes Indocumentados.
Acción Ejecutiva de Responsabilidad de Inmigración fue anunciada por el presidente Obama. ¿Es usted o alguien que usted conoce un Beneficiario? (Parte I)
Acción Ejecutiva de Responsabilidad de Inmigración fue anunciada por el presidente Obama. ¿Es usted o alguien que usted conoce un Beneficiario? (Parte II)
Acción Ejecutiva de Responsabilidad de Inmigración fue anunciada por el presidente Obama. ¿Es usted o alguien que usted conoce un Beneficiario? (Parte III)
Acción Ejecutiva de Responsabilidad de Inmigración fue anunciada por el presidente Obama. ¿Es usted o alguien que usted conoce un Beneficiario? (Parte IV)
Acción Ejecutiva de Responsabilidad de Inmigración fue anunciada por el presidente Obama. ¿Es usted o alguien que usted conoce un Beneficiario? (Parte V)
Acción Ejecutiva de Responsabilidad de Inmigración fue anunciada por el presidente Obama. ¿Es usted o alguien que usted conoce un Beneficiario? (Parte VI)
EL RECIENTE ANUNCIO DEL PRESIDENTE OBAMA SOBRE LA RESPONSABILIDAD INMIGRACIÓN PRESENTA MUCHOS BENEFICIOS PARA MUCHAS COMUNIDADES DE INMIGRANTES!
Immigration Accountability Executive Action Was Announced By President Obama. Are You or Someone You Know a Beneficiary? (Part VI)
PRESIDENT OBAMA'S RECENT ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT IMMIGRATION ACCOUNTABILITY PRESENTS MANY BENEFITS FOR MANY IMMIGRANT COMMUNITIES!
November
Immigration Accountability Executive Action Was Announced By President Obama. Are You or Someone You Know a Beneficiary? (Part IV)
Immigration Accountability Executive Action Was Announced By President Obama. Are You or Someone You Know a Beneficiary? (Part V)
Immigration Accountability Executive Action Was Announced By President Obama. Are You or Someone You Know a Beneficiary? (Part I)
Immigration Accountability Executive Action Was Announced By President Obama. Are You or Someone You Know a Beneficiary? (Part II)
Immigration Accountability Executive Action Was Announced By President Obama. Are You or Someone You Know a Beneficiary? (Part III) Changes to Provisional Waivers and "Extreme Hardship Definition.
Immigration Accountability Executive Action Was Announced By President Obama. Are You or Someone You Know a Beneficiary? (Part IV)
5 Things to know about how President Obama's Actions Impacts Undocumented Immigrants.
Programa de Refugiados y de Admisión Condicional para menores de edad de El Salvador, Guatemala y Honduras con padres legalmente presentes en los Estados Unidos.
ÚLTIMAS NOTICIAS DE INMIGRACIÓN EN LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS: Reforma Integral de Inmigración.
USCIS Expands the Definition of "Mother" and "Parent" to Include Gestational Mothers Using Assisted Reproductive Technogy (ART)
U.S. IMMIGRATION NEWS FLASH: President Obama Announces Administrative Relief for Immigrants in the U.S.
In-Country Refugee/Parole Program for Minors in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras With Parents Lawfully Present in the United States
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2013
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2012
December
November
October
September
May
April
March
February
January
2011
2010
2009


National in scope, the business immigration law firm of NPZ Law Group represents clients from throughout the United States and around world. Regionally, our attorneys remain committed to serving the immigration needs of businesses in the Tri-state area and the Hudson Valley, including residents of Ridgewood, Newark, and Jersey City, Burlington County, Bergen County, Camden County, Cumberland County, Essex County, Hudson County, Mercer County, Middlesex County, Monmouth County, Morris County, Passaic County, Salem County, Union County, northern New Jersey, southern New Jersey, central New Jersey, NJ; New York City, Rockland County, Orange County, Westchester County, Kings County, Sullivan County, Ulster County, New York, NY; Chicago, Illinois, IL; and Toronto and Montreal, Canada. Our nationwide practice focused on quality legal representation and personal service.



© 2018 NPZ Law Group | Disclaimer
487 Goffle Road , Ridgewood, NJ 07450
| Phone: 866-599-3625

About | Attorneys | Types of Visas | Resources | Testimonials | Types of Immigration Law | Services

Law Firm Website Design by
Amicus Creative